| Language of instruction : English |
| Exam contract: not possible |
|
Sequentiality
|
| |
|
Mandatory sequentiality bound on the level of programme components
|
| |
| |
|
Group 1 |
| |
| |
Following programme components must have been included in your study programme in a previous education period
|
| |
|
Experimental Design in Bioelectronics & Nanotechnology (3966)
|
8.0 stptn |
| |
|
Junior internship (3969)
|
15.0 stptn |
| |
|
Or group 2 |
| |
| |
Following programme components must have been included in your study programme in a previous education period
|
| |
|
Experimental Design in Environmental Health Sciences (3961)
|
8.0 stptn |
| |
|
Junior internship (4011)
|
15.0 stptn |
| |
|
Or group 3 |
| |
| |
Following programme components must have been included in your study programme in a previous education period
|
| |
|
Experimental Design in Molecular Mechanisms in Health and Disease (3950)
|
8.0 stptn |
| |
|
Junior internship (4011)
|
15.0 stptn |
| |
|
Or group 4 |
| |
| |
Following programme components must have been included in your study programme in a previous education period
|
| |
|
Experimental Design in Environmental Health Sciences (3961)
|
8.0 stptn |
| |
|
Junior practical training (2093)
|
15.0 stptn |
| |
|
Or group 5 |
| |
| |
Following programme components must have been included in your study programme in a previous education period
|
| |
|
Experimental Design in Molecular Mechanisms in Health and Disease (3950)
|
8.0 stptn |
| |
|
Junior practical training (2093)
|
15.0 stptn |
| |
|
| Degree programme | | Study hours | Credits | P1 SBU | P1 SP | 2nd Chance Exam1 | Tolerance2 | Final grade3 | |
 | 2nd year Master of Biomedical Sciences - Bioelectronics and Nanotechnology | Compulsory | 270 | 10,0 | 270 | 10,0 | Yes | No | Numerical |  |
| 2nd year Master of Biomedical Sciences - Environmental Health Sciences | Compulsory | 270 | 10,0 | 270 | 10,0 | Yes | No | Numerical | |
| 2nd year Master of Biomedical Sciences - Molecular Mechanisms in Health and Disease | Compulsory | 270 | 10,0 | 270 | 10,0 | Yes | No | Numerical | |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| 2. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can independently and critically perform a literature search. | - EC
| 3. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can draw up a new research hypothesis based on his or her own findings or based on the findings of others, and work out a research proposal for this. | - EC
| 4. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences has knowledge of state-of-the-art techniques within biomedical research and is able to apply these techniques, taking into account the applicable quality standards. | - EC
| 7. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences takes a critical attitude towards one's own research and that of others. | - EC
| 8. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can actively participate in an international research environment. | - EC
| 9. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can set up, conduct and report biomedical research in an ethical manner and with integrity, taking into account current regulations. | - EC
| 10. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences knows the potential for valorization of biomedical research and can translate own research into translational research. | - EC
| 11. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can function in a multidisciplnary team and can fulfill a bridging function between the various actors in health care. The graduate knows the importance and needs of the various stakeholders within the life sciences. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
The student can apply the scientific method to:
• produce a feasible & testable research proposal/study design based on the senior internship topic.
• formulate novel, testable project hypotheses & objectives
• define endpoints & deliverables in a project proposal
• interact at a scientific level with peers & coaches and to ask relevant questions
• suggest research strategies to address specific scientific questions
• present & defend a research proposal
The student :
• has basic knowlegde of valorization strategies and IP database searches.
• knows the different funding organisations national and international.
• has basic knowledge of data management and GDPR guidelines
• has basic knowledge on biosafety rules and knows how to apply these.
• has basis knowledge on medical ethical approval
• has basic knowledge on biobank regulations and can apply for a biobank collection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment preparation ✔
|
|
|
|
Coaching and peer discussion in small groups ✔
|
|
|
|
Grant proposal preparation ✔
|
|
|
|
Interdisciplinary project design in small groups ✔
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Scientific English coaching sessions in small groups ✔
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion/debate ✔
|
|
|
|
Presentation ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 1 Credits 10,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Written evaluaton during teaching periode | 20 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other | Collaboration/active participation in discussion groups and Joint PhD grant contest. Critical peer review of research proposals of fellow students. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral evaluation during teaching period | 5 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
| Other | Joint PhD grant contest |
|
|
|
|
|
| Written exam | 50 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
| Other | Masterproof Grant Research proposal. Scientific critical peer review of research proposals of fellow students. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral exam | 25 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other | Masterproof Grant Research proposal presentation and defense. Scientific critical peer review of the presentation and defense of fellow students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | - All coaching and training sessions are obligatory
- The Opinno and Biobizz sessions are obligatory
- All assignments have to be scored with 'Pass'; BEN students also have to pass the valorization assignment.
- The evaluation consists of multiple components. For all parts of the evaluation, at least a score of 10/20 must be obtained in order to pass the course.
- A student should be scientific critical in the review of research proposals submitted by fellow students and their presentation and defense of the proposed research. |
|
|
|
| Consequences | - Students who are unauthorized absent at one or more coaching/training sessions, receive "N" (unauthorized absence) as final grade for the course.
- A student who achieves a score lower than 10/20 on one (or more) parts of the evaluation will receive "F" (fail) as a final result for the course.
- If the critical review of the research proposal, presentation and defense of a fellow student is unsufficient according to the criteria on Blackboard, the student will receive "F" (fail) as a final score for the course in the first chance exams. The student will receive an alternative assignment during the second-chance exam period. The results of the other evaluation parts can be retained for the second-chance exam if the student has passed (at least 10/20) these parts. |
|
|
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
|
|
| Previously purchased compulsory textbooks |
| |
Scientific Writing and Communication,A. Hofmann,4th edition,Oxford University Press,9780190063283 |
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Additional course material will be provided on blackboard. |
|
|
| Remarks |
| |
The content of this course is master specific, as is the associated senior internship and master's thesis. This means that when registering for another master's specialisation, grant writing (4143), senior internship (4153) and master's thesis (4151) have to be part of the academic program of this specialisation (no exemption). |
|
|
|
|
|
| second year Master of Biomedical Sciences - Clinical Biomedical Sciences | Compulsory | 270 | 10,0 | 270 | 10,0 | Yes | No | Numerical | |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| 2. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can independently and critically perform a literature search | - EC
| 3. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can draw up a new research hypothesis based on his or her own findings or based on the findings of others, and work out a research proposal for this. | - EC
| 4. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences has knowledge of state-of-the-art techniques within biomedical research and is able to apply these techniques, taking into account the applicable quality standards. | - EC
| 6. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can report scientific findings in writing and orally to both experts and a wide audience in a structured way. | - EC
| 7. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences takes a critical attitude towards one's own research and that of others. | - EC
| 8. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can actively participate in an international research environment. | - EC
| 9. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can set up, conduct and report biomedical research in an ethical manner and with integrity, taking into account current regulations. | - EC
| 10. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences knows the potential for valorization of biomedical research and can translate own research into translational research. | - EC
| 11. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can function in a multidisciplinary team and can fulfill a bridging function between the various actors in health care. The graduate knows the importance and needs of the various stakeholders within the life sciences. | - EC
| KBW 2. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences specialization Clinical Biomedical Sciences has knowledge and understanding of the regulations of "Good Clinical Practice" and can apply this in practice; he / she can also design and follow up clinical studies. | - EC
| KBW 5. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences specialization Clinical Biomedical Sciences has knowledge and insight into the ethical and legal aspects of clinical studies, drug research and the use of human body material. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
The student can apply the scientific method to:
• produce a feasible & testable research proposal/study design based on the senior internship topic.
• formulate novel, testable project hypotheses & objectives
• define endpoints & deliverables in a project proposal
• interact at a scientific level with peers & coaches and to ask relevant questions
• suggest research strategies to address specific scientific questions
• present & defend a research proposal
The student :
• has basic knowlegde of valorization strategies and IP database searches.
• knows the different funding organisations national and international.
• has basic knowledge of data management and GDPR guidelines
• has basic knowledge on biosafety rules and knows how to apply these.
• can apply for medical ethical or animal ethical approvals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment preparation ✔
|
|
|
|
Coaching and peer discussion in small groups ✔
|
|
|
|
Grant proposal preparation ✔
|
|
|
|
Interdisciplinary project design in small groups ✔
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Scientific English coaching sessions in small groups ✔
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion/debate ✔
|
|
|
|
Presentation ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 1 Credits 10,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Written evaluaton during teaching periode | 20 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other | Collaboration/active participation in discussion groups and Joint PhD grant contest. Critical peer review of research proposals of fellow students. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral evaluation during teaching period | 5 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
| Other | Joint PhD grant contest |
|
|
|
|
|
| Written exam | 50 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
| Other | Masterproof Grant Research proposal. Scientific critical peer review of research proposals of fellow students. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral exam | 25 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other | Masterproof Grant Research proposal presentation and defense. Scientific critical peer review of the presentation and defense of fellow students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | - All coaching and training sessions are obligatory
- The Opinno and Biobizz sessions are obligatory
- All assignments have to be scored with 'Pass'; BEN students also have to pass the valorization assignment.
- The evaluation consists of multiple components. For all parts of the evaluation, at least a score of 10/20 must be obtained in order to pass the course.
- A student should be scientific critical in the review of research proposals submitted by fellow students and their presentation and defense of the proposed research. |
|
|
|
| Consequences | - Students who are unauthorized absent at one or more coaching/training sessions, receive "N" (unauthorized absence) as final grade for the course.
- A student who achieves a score lower than 10/20 on one (or more) parts of the evaluation will receive "F" (fail) as a final result for the course.
- If the critical review of the research proposal, presentation and defense of a fellow student is unsufficient according to the criteria on Blackboard, the student will receive "F" (fail) as a final score for the course in the first chance exams. The student will receive an alternative assignment during the second-chance exam period. The results of the other evaluation parts can be retained for the second-chance exam if the student has passed (at least 10/20) these parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Previously purchased compulsory textbooks |
| |
Scientific Writing and Communication,A. Hofmann,4th edition,Oxford University Press,9780190063283 |
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Additional course material will be provided on blackboard. |
|
|
| Remarks |
| |
The content of this course is master specific, as is the associated senior internship and master's thesis. This means that when registering for another master's specialisation, grant writing (4143), senior internship (4153) and master's thesis (4151) have to be part of the academic program of this specialisation (no exemption). |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.12.2, section 2. |
| 2 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.16.9, section 2. |
3 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.15.1, section 3.
|
| Legend |
| SBU : course load | SP : ECTS | N : Dutch | E : English |
|