| Language of instruction : English |
| Exam contract: not possible |
|
Sequentiality
|
| |
|
No sequentiality
|
| Degree programme | | Study hours | Credits | P1 SBU | P1 SP | 2nd Chance Exam1 | Tolerance2 | Final grade3 | |
 | 2nd Master of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy for Neurological Disorders | Compulsory | 81 | 3,0 | 81 | 3,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical |  |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| 2. The graduate of the master of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy can, at an integrated level, on the basis of a physiotherapeutic diagnosis for complex problems, and in consultation with the patient/client, draw up treatment goals and a prevention and treatment plan, implement this plan (with the help of technology) and evaluate its clinical effectiveness. | | | - DC
| The student uses relevant technological developments in formulating treatment goals, carrying out a treatment and/or in evaluating clinical effectiveness. | | | | - BC
| The student knows about the technical developments in the specific domain. | | | | - BC
| De student can judge the therapeutic potential of using these technological developments. | - EC
| 3. The graduate of the master of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy can communicate appropriately, in writing and orally, with all interested parties in a manner that is respectful of the identity/privacy of the patient/client. | | | - DC
| The student is able to communicate in presenting and writing in an adequate and professional manner. | | | - DC
| The student can orally and written communicate about a chosen technological developments including its usefulness for clinical indications. | - EC
| 6. The graduate of the master of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy can contribute to innovation within rehabilitation sciences. | | | - DC
| The student works in group to find solutions for clinical rehabilitation needs. | - EC
| 9. The graduate of the master of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy can make a critical synthesis of international scientific and professional literature with an impact on evidence-based practice. | | | - DC
| The student is able to assess international scientific and technical literature with a view to an evidence-based approach to clinical practice. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
The student knows the pathophysiology, functioning problems, clinical assessment and rehabilitation evidence and strategies for common neurological conditions. The student is familiar with general measurement methodology.
|
|
|
|
Main themes that are addressed:
Rehabiltiation techology principles (hardware, virtual reality and serious games, motor learning feedback, evaluation modules)
Rehabilitation technology applications (upper limb rehabilitation, balance and gait, mHealth, tele-rehabilitation).
Evidence underpinning the use of technology for different clinical populations and disability level.
There are hand-on sessions with rehabilitation techonology where students reflect on cost-effectiveness.
Broad reflection on indciations, application context and cost versus gains, evidence, patient experiences etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Practical ✔
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group work ✔
|
|
|
|
Presentation ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 1 Credits 3,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Written evaluaton during teaching periode | 25 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
| Conditions transfer of partial marks within the academic year | The student obtained 10/20. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral evaluation during teaching period | 25 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
| Conditions transfer of partial marks within the academic year | The student obtained 10/20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Written exam | 50 % |
|
| Multiple-choice questions | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | The student conducts the written (report) and oral (presentation) assignments according to the guidelines. |
|
|
|
| Consequences | If the written or oral assignment is not executed according to the guidelines, will this lead to'0' for this part.
If the student is illegitimate absent during the presentation, the student will receive a '0' for this part. If the student is legitimately absent during the presentation, a replacement assignment is provided. |
|
|
|
| Additional information | Adequate input from each student is expected in group work. Peer evaluation is done through Buddycheck program on blackboard. The factor that is calculated by this program is multiplied by the score of the group work, for each student.
The final grade is the weighted mathematical mean. If a student has a grade of <10/20 on one part (the group work presentation or report, or the individual written exam, the weighted mathematical average is calculated and from this unrounded weighted result, 0.5 points (out of 20) will be deducted. If a student has a grade of <10/20 on two parts of the above listed components, then the weighted mathematical average is calculated and from this unrounded weighted result, 1.5 points (out of 20) will be deducted.
This result is then rounded in accordance with the rounding rules of the OER and is the final result of the course. |
|
|
|
| Recommended course material |
| |
Course material will be available on TEAMS, the platform selected to host the inter-university program in neurological rehabilitation. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.12.2, section 2. |
| 2 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.16.9, section 2. |
3 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.15.1, section 3.
|
| Legend |
| SBU : course load | SP : ECTS | N : Dutch | E : English |
|