De elektronische studiegids voor het academiejaar 2025 - 2026 is onder voorbehoud.





Transport Innovation and Valorisation (4919)

  
Coordinating lecturer :Prof. dr. ir. Wim ECTORS 
  
Member of the teaching team :Mevrouw Thi TRAN 


Language of instruction : English


Credits: 6,0
  
Period: semester 1 (6sp)
  
2nd Chance Exam1: Yes
  
Final grade2: Numerical
 
Exam contract: not possible


 
Sequentiality
 
   Mandatory sequentiality bound on the level of programme components
 
 

Prerequisites

Not applicable



Content

Transport Innovation and Valorisation is a 6-credit course designed to teach students how to develop innovative transport solutions that matter to people. The course adopts the systematic approach of the Stanford BioDesign innovation process, which involves identifying unmet needs or challenges in transportation, developing potential solutions, and implementing and commercializing the most promising ideas. Students will gain exposure to this innovation process as a framework for addressing key challenges in transportation and improving efficiency, safety, sustainability, and accessibility. The course offers lectures on related topics and contains a group assignment where students will innovate in group on a (predefined) topic using the innovation process.



Organisational and teaching methods
Organisational methods  
Lecture  
Response lecture  
Small group session  
Teaching methods  
Case study  
Discussion/debate  
Group work  
Paper  
Presentation  


Evaluation

Semester 1 (6,00sp)

Evaluation method
Written evaluaton during teaching periode30 %
Transfer of partial marks within the academic year
Conditions transfer of partial marks within the academic yearIn case of min 10/20 on the paper (evaluation during teaching period) this score will be retained in the academic year.
Paper
Oral evaluation during teaching period70 %
Transfer of partial marks within the academic year
Conditions transfer of partial marks within the academic yearIn case of min 10/20 on the presentation part (evaluation during teaching period) this score will be retained in the academic year.
Presentation
Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass)
Conditions Timely submission of the final paper (evaluation during teaching period) is mandatory. Attendance and active participation in the work sessions (=group work) is mandatory. The student should actively contribute to the group work.
Consequences Students who do not submit the paper, or submit it after the deadline, will receive a final score of N for this course. Unlawful absence of a student may lead to an individually adjusted score. Students' performance in group will be evaluated through peer assessment (e.g. BuddyCheck) and may lead to an individually adjusted score.
Additional information Students who failed the course in the first term are given a replacement individual assignment for the second examination period, depending on which part(s) of the course they failed. They need to ask the members of the teaching team which part(s) they need to redo during resit (oral presentation, case study and/or paper...). The 2nd exam chance is an individual assignment, not a group assignment.

Second examination period

Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt
Yes
Explanation (English)Students who failed the course in the first term are given a replacement individual assignment for the second examination period, depending on which part(s) of the course they failed. They need to ask the members of the teaching team which part(s) they need to redo during resit (oral presentation, case study and/or paper...). The 2nd exam chance is an individual assignment, not a group assignment.
 

Recommended reading
  Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies,Paul G. Yock, Stefanos Zenios, Josh Makower, Todd J. Brinton, Uday N. Kumar, F. T. Jay Watkins, Lyn Denend, Thomas M. Krummel, Christine Q. Kurihara,2,Cambridge University Press,9781107087354


Learning outcomes
Master of Transportation Sciences
  •  EC 
  • EC8: The holder of the degree acts and reflects in an ethical and sustainable way.

     
  •  DC 
  • DC4: The student considers the impact of his/her actions on himself/herself, other people and society as a whole.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC2: The student adheres to the deontological codes of research.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC3: The student works systematically and critically reflects on the process at each step.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC1: The student is able to autonomously conduct research in transportation sciences, including formulating sustainable recommendations and demonstrating their practical applicability.

      
  •  BC 
  •  EC 
  • EC6: The holder of the degree is able to communicate and convince others on his/her field of study, both in writing and orally,  addressing  scientists of his/her own or similar fields of study and wide social groups.

     
  •  DC 
  • DC1: The student is able to communicate on the process, results as well as his/her views in writing in a logically structured and clearly understandable way and to exchange views on these with others.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC2: The student is able to verbally communicate on the process, results and his/her views in a logically structured and clearly understandable way and to exchange views on these with others.

      
  •  BC 
  •  EC 
  • EC7: The holder of the degree is able to function as a member of a (multidisciplinary) team and has a good assessment of his/her own role within the team/organization and in the broader social and international context.

     
  •  DC 
  • DC5: The student works towards sustainable solutions in consultation with others.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC4: The student can both give and receive substantiated feedback to fellow students in a constructive way.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC2: The student can reflect on his/her own role in a (multidisciplinary) team.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC3: The student makes an active and constructive contribution to the team.

      
  •  BC 
  •  EC 
  • EC4: The holder of the degree considers the society as a whole as an important stakeholder and reflects on the social relevance and consequences of recommendations/solutions and projects/assignments in a critical manner. In doing so, the holder of the degree strives, among other things, to have a sustainable impact on the region.

     
  •  DC 
  • DC3: Based on the research conducted, the student can draw up recommendations that are relevant to stakeholders and that contribute to a sustainable impact on the region.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC1: The student is able to identify key stakeholders other than society and demonstrate their relevance.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC2: The student is able to empathise with and take into account the views of different stakeholders when assessing and developing different solution options.

      
  •  BC 
  •  EC 
  • EC1: The holder of the degree applies knowledge in an independent and self-directed manner. He/she is able to critically plan, guard, manage and evaluate his/her own learning processes and to take care of his/her own (quality) control.

     
  •  DC 
  • DC4: The student evaluates his/her way of working taking into account the quality of the work and draws lessons for the future. 

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC2: The student shows initiative in groups, creates opportunities by anticipating and adopts a flexible attitude.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC5: The student works in an autonomous and self-managing way, engaging in self-reflection and striving for continuous improvement.

      
  •  BC 
  •  EC 
  • EC2: The holder of the degree has in-depth knowledge and understanding of the concepts, methods, and (research) techniques of transportation sciences. He/she is able to apply the concepts, methods and (research) techniques in the field of transportation sciences adequately and autonomously.

     
  •  DC 
  • DC1: The student can autonomously consult, assess and synthesise international scientific professional literature from the field of transportation sciences in terms of the knowledge required.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC4: The student autonomously applies the selected concepts, methods or techniques for scientific research and interprets them adequately.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC3: The student can autonomously select and justify appropriate concepts, methods or techniques for scientific research based on a given context.

      
  •  BC 
  •  
  •  DC 
  • DC2: The student can take a standpoint based on information from international scientific literature and substantiate this.

      
  •  BC 
 

  EC = learning outcomes      DC = partial outcomes      BC = evaluation criteria  
Offered inTolerance3
2nd year Master of Transportation Sciences option course for TPP V J
2nd year Master of Transportation Sciences option course for TS V J



1   Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.12.2, section 2.
2   Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.15.1, section 3.
3   Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.16.9, section 2.