| Language of instruction : English |
| Exam contract: not possible |
|
Sequentiality
|
| |
|
Mandatory sequentiality bound on the level of programme components
|
| |
| |
| |
For following programme components you must have acquired a credit certificate, exemption, already tolerated unsatisfactory grade or selected tolerable unsatisfactory grade.
|
| |
|
Labour Law and Social Security Law (2124)
|
12,0 stptn |
| |
|
| Degree programme | | Study hours | Credits | P3 SBU | P3 SP | 2nd Chance Exam1 | Tolerance2 | Final grade3 | |
 | First year Master of Laws: Laws - corporate | Compulsory | 162 | 6,0 | 162 | 6,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical |  |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is able to identify the various stakeholders and their specific interests in a complex problem and to integrate those in his own reasoning and approach. | | | - DC
| On the basis of an anonimised file regarding cross-border employment, the student is able to identify the various stakehoders (parties) and their specific interests. Upon consultation with his teammembers he drafts a (joint) written brief for one of the parties to the case and prepares, with the same teammembers, the oral pleadings session during which each of the teammembers should take the floor. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: recognizes ethical and societal aspects within a legal context, is able critically to reflect upon these and to have ethical considerations inform his opinions, taking account of his responsibilities as a lawyer. | | | - DC
| The student is able to take a well-informed legal position (recognising ethical and societal aspects) with respect to the different Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assignments he prepares for the tutorial groups. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is able actively and constructively to contribute in group to a common goal in a multidisciplinary context. | | | - DC
| De student prepares his participation in the internal moot court exercise within a group of three to four students. The teammembers collaborate to analyse the problem, to draft the (joint) written brief and to prepare oral pleadings during which each teammember takes the floor. Teammembers show their active and constructive collaboration through the deposit of the (joint) minutes of one meeting. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is able adequately to communicate and present his own ideas, views and solutions in various contexts, either orally or in written form, and is able to present in (legal) English and French. | | | - DC
| The student is able to communicate, to colleagues/ peers and to laymen, his own ideas, views and solutions in various contexts, either orally or in written form. He participates in an active way in discussions during tutorial groups; at least once he will act as a discussion leader or reporter. He drafts a (joint) written brief and pleads individually within the framework of the internal moot court exercise. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is aware of the importance of negotiation and mediation, understands various negotiation and mediation techniques and is able to apply the basic techniques in an adequate manner. | | | - DC
| The student is able to analyse an employment conflict on the basis of specialist literature that is made available to him, and can inform his opinion. He can also simulate Collective Labour Agreement (CLA) negotiations and represent the interests of one party to those negotiations. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is able to plan and evaluate his own approach and learning processes in an independent manner. | | | - DC
| The student is able to prepare in team and throughout the entire study period (i.e. without intermediate deadlines) for the internal moot court exercise. He keeps a record of his individual time spent on Blackboard (timesheet). | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: demonstrates a positive attitude towards lifelong learning. | | | - DC
| The student studies the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assignments, analyses them and proposes a solution. In that respect, he looks for the most recent legal literature and integrates it in the solution he proposes. | - EC
| The graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general academic research competences: is able to make critical and independent use of various (digital) sources within the legal domain, in Dutch, French and English. | | | - DC
| The student is able to find the required legal sources in Dutch, English or French, analyse them and use them with a view to prepare the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assignments and his participation in the internal moot court exercise. | - EC
| The graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general academic research competences: is able to analyse, interpret and make responsible use of Statute, case-law, scholarship and other legal sources. | | | - DC
| The student is able to analyse, interpret and make responsible use of Statute, case-law and scholarship with a view to solving the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assignments and participating in the internal moot court exercise. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme possesses the following academic (specifically legal) skills and knowledge. He has specialised academic knowledge of and an understanding of the concepts and structure of those branches of law relevant to the major subject chosen, European and comparative perspectives included. He is able to apply that knowledge and those insights, including from a European and comparative perspectives. | | | - DC
| The student has a specialised academic knowledge and understanding of different topics of the broader field of social law (labour law and social security law) and is able to find links between those different topics. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme possesses the following academic, in casu: legal, knowledge: He understands the continuous interaction between national, supranational and international law. | | | - DC
| The students shows that he has a good comprehesion of and understands the continuous interaction between the national, supranational and international dimension of the social law topics studied in this course. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme possesses the following academic, in casu: legal, knowledge: understands the recent societal developments and the academic research in the sector. | | | - DC
| The student can analyse a social law problem and make it accessible from a society point of view, among other things on the basis of recent scholarship. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
At the end of the Advanced Employment Law course students will have gained an understanding of (the relevance of) international and European legal instruments in the field of employment law.
Students are made familiar in particular with the (direct and indirect) competences of the European institutions in the field of employment law. Furthermore, students learn how to handle relevant international and European law sources with respect to employment law problems in general, including those related to the specific topics that are discussed during this course.
In the first part of the course, the competences of the international and European institutions in the field of employment law are explained. Thus, an overview is given of employment law standards pronounced by the International Labour Organisation, the Council of Europe and the European Union. More specifically, the powers of the European institutions in the field of employment law are discussed in more detail as well as the instruments that the European Union has at its disposal.
In the second part of the course a number of selected topics are addressed, like e.g. European and international legislation on the prohibition of discrimination on different grounds such as nationality, gender, age, disability and race; employment termination rules in different coutries; corporate social responsability; collective dismissals; negotiation and mediation in employment law, etc.
[With a proviso] In 2021-2022, the learning outcomes of this course can also be reached through participation in the Hugo Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition (https://aias-hsi.uva.nl/hs-mcc/hs-mcc.html?cb), an international Moot Court competition covering 12 countries. The competition is organised yearly by the Hugo Sinzheimer Institute (Law Faculty, Universiteit van Amsterdam) together with one of the participating universities.
Selected students will have to prepare written conclusions about a case dealing with European labour law, for both the claimant and the defendant. The team will then be invited to take part in the finals of the competition and present their case by pleading against other national teams.
One to three students maximum will be selected for this purpose. Further information is provided in due time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Tutorial group ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 3 Credits 6,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Other evaluation method during teaching period | 50 % |
|
| Other | Continuous assessment consisting of two parts. The first part (3 out of 10 points) is an evaluation of the student's efforts as either PBL manager, discussion leader or reporter during the tutorial group meetings. The second part (7 out of 10 points) is an evaluation of the teamwork (moot court), as explained in the course book. |
|
|
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | Participation in both parts of the evaluation (continuous assessment and take home exam) is a condition to obtain a final grade for this course in both the first and the second attempt examination.
The grade for the continuous assessment remains valid for a possible delayed first attempt examination (so-called catch-up examination). |
|
|
|
| Consequences | If you did not obtain a result for the continuous assessment, you cannot receive a final grade in either the first or the second examination period on the basis of the take home exam alone. |
|
|
|
| Additional information | First attempt examination: 50 % of the final grade is based on continuous assessment during the education period and the other 50% on a take home exam during the (first) examination period (cf. further explanation in the course book).
(with a proviso) For students who take part in the H. Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition:
First attempt examination: 50% of the final grade will be based on the written conclusions; the other 50% will be based on the oral plea, assessed through a rehearsal pleading which will be organised before the actual Moot Court Competition takes place.
In consultation with the Programme Board and the Student Administration, the lecturer determines the schedule and the examination format for a possible catch-up exam. The examination format may deviate from the examination format used during the regular examination period. The schedule and examination format will be communicated to the student after the request for a catch-up exam has been approved. |
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
| Explanation (English) | Resit policy: 50 % of the final grade remains based on the continuous assessment during the education period and the other 50% on a take home exam during the (second) examination period (cf. further explanation in the course book).
Depending on the number of participants, the assessment form may be changed.
(with a proviso) For students who take part in the H. Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition:
Second attempt examination: adapted to the specific circumstances. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Prerequisites |
| |
Students who want to take this course must have acquired a credit certificate, exemption, already tolerated unsatisfactory grade or selected tolerable unsatisfactory grade for the course of ‘Labour law and social security law’ (‘Arbeidsrecht en sociale zekerheidsrecht’) (Hasselt University code 2124) or another intruductory course in (national) employment law or social law more generally. |
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Course book: the course book for this course is made available on Blackboard in due time. |
|
|
| Remarks |
| |
As continuous assessment is key to this course, it is necessary that students take part in all activities throughout the study period. Should students not be able to be present throughout the whole study period, e.g. because of participation in the Erasmus exchange programme, they should get in touch with the teaching staff well ahead of the start of the course (preferably before Christmas holidays): ingrid.vrancken@uhasselt.be. The teaching staff decides whether the absence of the student during a part of the study period can be made up by an alternative assignment.
One lecture or tutorial group meeting may be taken care off by a French-speaking guest. Exchange students who do not speak French will be given an assignment to replace this lecture/ tutorial group meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Exchange Programme Laws | Optional | 162 | 6,0 | 162 | 6,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
|
| |
|
|
At the end of the Advanced Employment Law course students will have gained an understanding of (the relevance of) international and European legal instruments in the field of employment law.
Students are made familiar in particular with the (direct and indirect) competences of the European institutions in the field of employment law. Furthermore, students learn how to handle relevant international and European law sources with respect to employment law problems in general, including those related to the specific topics that are discussed during this course.
In the first part of the course, the competences of the international and European institutions in the field of employment law are explained. Thus, an overview is given of employment law standards pronounced by the International Labour Organisation, the Council of Europe and the European Union. More specifically, the powers of the European institutions in the field of employment law are discussed in more detail as well as the instruments that the European Union has at its disposal.
In the second part of the course a number of selected topics are addressed, like e.g. European and international legislation on the prohibition of discrimination on different grounds such as nationality, gender, age, disability and race; employment termination rules in different coutries; corporate social responsability; collective dismissals; negotiation and mediation in employment law, etc.
[With a proviso] In 2021-2022, the learning outcomes of this course can also be reached through participation in the Hugo Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition (https://aias-hsi.uva.nl/hs-mcc/hs-mcc.html?cb), an international Moot Court competition covering 12 countries. The competition is organised yearly by the Hugo Sinzheimer Institute (Law Faculty, Universiteit van Amsterdam) together with one of the participating universities.
Selected students will have to prepare written conclusions about a case dealing with European labour law, for both the claimant and the defendant. The team will then be invited to take part in the finals of the competition and present their case by pleading against other national teams.
One to three students maximum will be selected for this purpose. Further information is provided in due time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Tutorial group ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 3 Credits 6,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Other evaluation method during teaching period | 50 % |
|
| Other | Continuous assessment consisting of two parts. The first part (3 out of 10 points) is an evaluation of the student's efforts as either PBL manager, discussion leader or reporter during the tutorial group meetings. The second part (7 out of 10 points) is an evaluation of the teamwork (moot court), as explained in the course book. |
|
|
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | Participation in both parts of the evaluation (continuous assessment and take home exam) is a condition to obtain a final grade for this course in both the first and the second attempt examination.
The grade for the continuous assessment remains valid for a possible delayed first attempt examination (so-called catch-up examination). |
|
|
|
| Consequences | If you did not obtain a result for the continuous assessment, you cannot receive a final grade in either the first or the second examination period on the basis of the take home exam alone. |
|
|
|
| Additional information | First attempt examination: 50 % of the final grade is based on continuous assessment during the education period and the other 50% on a take home exam during the (first) examination period (cf. further explanation in the course book).
(with a proviso) For students who take part in the H. Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition:
First attempt examination: 50% of the final grade will be based on the written conclusions; the other 50% will be based on the oral plea, assessed through a rehearsal pleading which will be organised before the actual Moot Court Competition takes place.
In consultation with the Programme Board and the Student Administration, the lecturer determines the schedule and the examination format for a possible catch-up exam. The examination format may deviate from the examination format used during the regular examination period. The schedule and examination format will be communicated to the student after the request for a catch-up exam has been approved. |
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
| Explanation (English) | Resit policy: 50 % of the final grade remains based on the continuous assessment during the education period and the other 50% on a take home exam during the (second) examination period (cf. further explanation in the course book).
Depending on the number of participants, the assessment form may be changed.
(with a proviso) For students who take part in the H. Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition:
Second attempt examination: adapted to the specific circumstances. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Prerequisites |
| |
Students who want to take this course must have acquired a credit certificate, exemption, already tolerated unsatisfactory grade or selected tolerable unsatisfactory grade for the course of ‘Labour law and social security law’ (‘Arbeidsrecht en sociale zekerheidsrecht’) (Hasselt University code 2124) or another intruductory course in (national) employment law or social law more generally. |
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Course book: the course book for this course is made available on Blackboard in due time. |
|
|
| Remarks |
| |
As continuous assessment is key to this course, it is necessary that students take part in all activities throughout the study period. Should students not be able to be present throughout the whole study period, e.g. because of participation in the Erasmus exchange programme, they should get in touch with the teaching staff well ahead of the start of the course (preferably before Christmas holidays): ingrid.vrancken@uhasselt.be. The teaching staff decides whether the absence of the student during a part of the study period can be made up by an alternative assignment.
One lecture or tutorial group meeting may be taken care off by a French-speaking guest. Exchange students who do not speak French will be given an assignment to replace this lecture/ tutorial group meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
| choice master for private (UH) | Optional | 162 | 6,0 | 162 | 6,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
| Master of Laws Government and Law | Optional | 162 | 6,0 | 162 | 6,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is able to identify the various stakeholders and their specific interests in a complex problem and to integrate those in his own reasoning and approach. | | | - DC
| On the basis of an anonimised file regarding cross-border employment, the student is able to identify the various stakehoders (parties) and their specific interests. Upon consultation with his teammembers he drafts a (joint) written brief for one of the parties to the case and prepares, with the same teammembers, the oral pleadings session during which each of the teammembers should take the floor. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: recognizes ethical and societal aspects within a legal context, is able critically to reflect upon these and to have ethical considerations inform his opinions, taking account of his responsibilities as a lawyer. | | | - DC
| The student is able to take a well-informed legal position (recognising ethical and societal aspects) with respect to the different Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assignments he prepares for the tutorial groups. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is able actively and constructively to contribute in group to a common goal in a multidisciplinary context. | | | - DC
| De student prepares his participation in the internal moot court exercise within a group of three to four students. The teammembers collaborate to analyse the problem, to draft the (joint) written brief and to prepare oral pleadings during which each teammember takes the floor. Teammembers show their active and constructive collaboration through the deposit of the (joint) minutes of one meeting. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is able adequately to communicate and present his own ideas, views and solutions in various contexts, either orally or in written form, and is able to present in (legal) English and French. | | | - DC
| The student is able to communicate, to colleagues/ peers and to laymen, his own ideas, views and solutions in various contexts, either orally or in written form. He participates in an active way in discussions during tutorial groups; at least once he will act as a discussion leader or reporter. He drafts a (joint) written brief and pleads individually within the framework of the internal moot court exercise. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is aware of the importance of negotiation and mediation, understands various negotiation and mediation techniques and is able to apply the basic techniques in an adequate manner. | | | - DC
| The student is able to analyse an employment conflict on the basis of specialist literature that is made available to him, and can inform his opinion. He can also simulate Collective Labour Agreement (CLA) negotiations and represent the interests of one party to those negotiations. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: is able to plan and evaluate his own approach and learning processes in an independent manner. | | | - DC
| The student is able to prepare in team and throughout the entire study period (i.e. without intermediate deadlines) for the internal moot court exercise. He keeps a record of his individual time spent on Blackboard (timesheet). | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general competence: demonstrates a positive attitude towards lifelong learning. | | | - DC
| The student studies the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assignments, analyses them and proposes a solution. In that respect, he looks for the most recent legal literature and integrates it in the solution he proposes. | - EC
| The graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general academic research competences: is able to make critical and independent use of various (digital) sources within the legal domain, in Dutch, French and English. | | | - DC
| The student is able to find the required legal sources in Dutch, English or French, analyse them and use them with a view to prepare the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assignments and his participation in the internal moot court exercise. | - EC
| The graduate of the Master of Laws programme has developed the following general academic research competences: is able to analyse, interpret and make responsible use of Statute, case-law, scholarship and other legal sources. | | | - DC
| The student is able to analyse, interpret and make responsible use of Statute, case-law and scholarship with a view to solving the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assignments and participating in the internal moot court exercise. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme possesses the following academic (specifically legal) skills and knowledge. He has specialised academic knowledge of and an understanding of the concepts and structure of those branches of law relevant to the major subject chosen, European and comparative perspectives included. He is able to apply that knowledge and those insights, including from a European and comparative perspectives. | | | - DC
| The student has a specialised academic knowledge and understanding of different topics of the broader field of social law (labour law and social security law) and is able to find links between those different topics. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme possesses the following academic, in casu: legal, knowledge: He understands the continuous interaction between national, supranational and international law. | | | - DC
| The students shows that he has a good comprehesion of and understands the continuous interaction between the national, supranational and international dimension of the social law topics studied in this course. | - EC
| A graduate of the Master of Laws programme possesses the following academic, in casu: legal, knowledge: understands the recent societal developments and the academic research in the sector. | | | - DC
| The student can analyse a social law problem and make it accessible from a society point of view, among other things on the basis of recent scholarship. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
At the end of the Advanced Employment Law course students will have gained an understanding of (the relevance of) international and European legal instruments in the field of employment law.
Students are made familiar in particular with the (direct and indirect) competences of the European institutions in the field of employment law. Furthermore, students learn how to handle relevant international and European law sources with respect to employment law problems in general, including those related to the specific topics that are discussed during this course.
In the first part of the course, the competences of the international and European institutions in the field of employment law are explained. Thus, an overview is given of employment law standards pronounced by the International Labour Organisation, the Council of Europe and the European Union. More specifically, the powers of the European institutions in the field of employment law are discussed in more detail as well as the instruments that the European Union has at its disposal.
In the second part of the course a number of selected topics are addressed, like e.g. European and international legislation on the prohibition of discrimination on different grounds such as nationality, gender, age, disability and race; employment termination rules in different coutries; corporate social responsability; collective dismissals; negotiation and mediation in employment law, etc.
[With a proviso] In 2021-2022, the learning outcomes of this course can also be reached through participation in the Hugo Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition (https://aias-hsi.uva.nl/hs-mcc/hs-mcc.html?cb), an international Moot Court competition covering 12 countries. The competition is organised yearly by the Hugo Sinzheimer Institute (Law Faculty, Universiteit van Amsterdam) together with one of the participating universities.
Selected students will have to prepare written conclusions about a case dealing with European labour law, for both the claimant and the defendant. The team will then be invited to take part in the finals of the competition and present their case by pleading against other national teams.
One to three students maximum will be selected for this purpose. Further information is provided in due time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Tutorial group ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 3 Credits 6,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Other evaluation method during teaching period | 50 % |
|
| Other | Continuous assessment consisting of two parts. The first part (3 out of 10 points) is an evaluation of the student's efforts as either PBL manager, discussion leader or reporter during the tutorial group meetings. The second part (7 out of 10 points) is an evaluation of the teamwork (moot court), as explained in the course book. |
|
|
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | Participation in both parts of the evaluation (continuous assessment and take home exam) is a condition to obtain a final grade for this course in both the first and the second attempt examination.
The grade for the continuous assessment remains valid for a possible delayed first attempt examination (so-called catch-up examination). |
|
|
|
| Consequences | If you did not obtain a result for the continuous assessment, you cannot receive a final grade in either the first or the second examination period on the basis of the take home exam alone. |
|
|
|
| Additional information | First attempt examination: 50 % of the final grade is based on continuous assessment during the education period and the other 50% on a take home exam during the (first) examination period (cf. further explanation in the course book).
(with a proviso) For students who take part in the H. Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition:
First attempt examination: 50% of the final grade will be based on the written conclusions; the other 50% will be based on the oral plea, assessed through a rehearsal pleading which will be organised before the actual Moot Court Competition takes place.
In consultation with the Programme Board and the Student Administration, the lecturer determines the schedule and the examination format for a possible catch-up exam. The examination format may deviate from the examination format used during the regular examination period. The schedule and examination format will be communicated to the student after the request for a catch-up exam has been approved. |
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
| Explanation (English) | Resit policy: 50 % of the final grade remains based on the continuous assessment during the education period and the other 50% on a take home exam during the (second) examination period (cf. further explanation in the course book).
Depending on the number of participants, the assessment form may be changed.
(with a proviso) For students who take part in the H. Sinzheimer Moot Court Competition:
Second attempt examination: adapted to the specific circumstances. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Prerequisites |
| |
Students who want to take this course must have acquired a credit certificate, exemption, already tolerated unsatisfactory grade or selected tolerable unsatisfactory grade for the course of ‘Labour law and social security law’ (‘Arbeidsrecht en sociale zekerheidsrecht’) (Hasselt University code 2124) or another intruductory course in (national) employment law or social law more generally. |
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Course book: the course book for this course is made available on Blackboard in due time. |
|
|
| Remarks |
| |
As continuous assessment is key to this course, it is necessary that students take part in all activities throughout the study period. Should students not be able to be present throughout the whole study period, e.g. because of participation in the Erasmus exchange programme, they should get in touch with the teaching staff well ahead of the start of the course (preferably before Christmas holidays): ingrid.vrancken@uhasselt.be. The teaching staff decides whether the absence of the student during a part of the study period can be made up by an alternative assignment.
One lecture or tutorial group meeting may be taken care off by a French-speaking guest. Exchange students who do not speak French will be given an assignment to replace this lecture/ tutorial group meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 examination regulations art.1.3, section 4. |
| 2 examination regulations art.4.7, section 2. |
3 examination regulations art.2.2, section 3.
|
| Legend |
| SBU : course load | SP : ECTS | N : Dutch | E : English |
|