| Language of instruction : English |
| Exam contract: not possible |
|
Sequentiality
|
| |
|
Mandatory sequentiality bound on the level of programme components
|
| |
| |
| |
Following programme components must have been included in your study programme up till now.
|
| |
|
Behavioural Interventions (4195)
|
4,0 stptn |
| |
|
Intelligent Solutions in Transportation (4200)
|
4,0 stptn |
| |
|
Research Design (4202)
|
4,0 stptn |
| |
|
Sustainable Transportation Policy (4198)
|
4,0 stptn |
| |
|
Transport Infrastructure (4196)
|
4,0 stptn |
| |
|
| Degree programme | | Study hours | Credits | P1 SBU | P1 SP | 2nd Chance Exam1 | Tolerance2 | Final grade3 | |
 | 1st year Master of Transportation Sciences (incl ICP) | Compulsory | 270 | 10,0 | 270 | 10,0 | Yes | No | Numerical |  |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| The holder of the degree is able to apply knowledge in an autonomous and self-managing manner. He/she is able to plan, guard, manage and evaluate his/her own learning processes and to take care of his/her own (quality) control. | | | - DC
| The student works in an autonomous and self-managing manner. | | | - DC
| The student can work in a problem solving manner. | - EC
| The holder of the degree is able to consult and summarize international scientific specialist literature in the domain of transportation sciences autonomously. Based on this information, he/she can take a substantiated stand. | | | - DC
| Students can look for suitable scientific literature (i.e. articles, books, reports) through the website of the library of Hasselt University. | | | - DC
| Students can structure, summarize and apply scientific literature from a theoretical framework. | | | - DC
| The student consults the sources which are identified as relevant by himself/herself in a methodologically sound manner. | | | - DC
| Based on concepts that are supplied during class and departing from an extensive reading list, the student is able to look up information autonomously in specialist literature to describe an existing case. | | | - DC
| Based on the study of the supplied concepts and the research carried out, the student is able to take a well-founded stand with regard to a described real-life situation. | - EC
| The holder of the degree can function as a member of a (multidisciplinary) team and has a good assessment of his/her own role within the organisation and in a wider social and international context. | | | - DC
| The student functions as member of a team, in an organisation (in a national or international context). | | | - DC
| In the framework of a group assignment, the student is able to make agreements on the work to be done and stick to these agreements or consult with other group members if and when adjustments are required. | - EC
| The holder of the degree considers society as a whole as an important stakeholder and reflects on the social relevance and consequences of recommendations and assignments in a critical manner. In addition to society, the master can also identify and set to work with other stakeholders (interested parties) and their specific needs. | | | - DC
| The student is able to identify the most important stakeholders within the context of his/her topic and to elucidate their relevance. | | | - DC
| The student can reflect the interests of the various stakeholders and take these into account when making recommendations. | - EC
| The holder of the degree is able to communicate and convince others (both in writing and orally) on his/her field of study (in the shape of scientific reports, presentations, case studies and the integrated project) with scientists of his/her own or similar fields of study and with wide social groups (e.g. residents, governments, shopkeepers). | | | - DC
| The student is able to orally communicate on a researched case study and argue his personal point of view. | | | - DC
| The student is able to communicate in writing on a researched case study and argue his personal point of view. | - EC
| The holder of the degree shows initiative, creates opportunities by anticipating and is flexible. | | | - DC
| The student always shows a motivated dedication, even when uncertainties or problems arise during the process. | | | - DC
| The student is not afraid to think out-of-the-box to come up with original but realistic ideas and strategies. | | | - DC
| The student is open to new ideas or information and is able to assess and integrate them in already existing knowledge and insights. | - EC
| The holder of the degree is able to identify relevant traffic safety and transportation problems in the field of transportation sciences. | | | - DC
| Students are able to analyse a clear problem taken from real-life from a theoretical framework. . | | | - DC
| The student can describe a concrete problem within the domain of traffic safety or mobility management and convert this to concrete objectives. | - EC
| The holder of the degree offers realistic solutions for complex traffic safety or transportation problems by using relevant theories and/or models from the field of study of transportation sciences or related domains. | | | - DC
| The student offers a realistic solution for a certain problem, based on knowledge and insight, gained from his academic schooling. | - EC
| The holder of the degree is able to autonomously carry out research in transportation sciences, formulate recommendations and show their practical applicability in daily life, whilst keeping to the deontological codes of research. | | | - DC
| Within small groups, students transfer the acquired knowledge from the theory lectures to practice. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
In a case-study of an international city such as Ho Chi Minh City, Jakarta, Bangkok, Dar Es Salaam, etc. students integrate knowledge and skills from other courses taught in the same semester, e.g. concepts of Behavioural Interventions, Transport Infrastructure, Intelligent Solutions in Transportation, etc. In parallel and together with fellow students you immediately apply what you learn to the case of an international mega-city. The case-study is developed in co-operation with an expert with expertise in the local transportation and traffic safety situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collective feedback moment ✔
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Small group session ✔
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case study ✔
|
|
|
|
Group work ✔
|
|
|
|
Paper ✔
|
|
|
|
Presentation ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 1 Credits 10,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Written evaluaton during teaching periode | 60 % |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral evaluation during teaching period | 40 % |
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | A student must have a tolerable score (min 8/20) on each component in order to pass the course. |
|
|
|
| Consequences | A student who has a non-tolerable score for one or more components (<8/20), will get 'fail' as the end result. |
|
|
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Presentations and additional course material (relevant articles, datasets, etc.) will be provided via Blackboard. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Exchange Programme Transportation Sciences | Optional | 270 | 10,0 | 270 | 10,0 | Yes | No | Numerical | |
|
| |
|
|
In a case-study of an international city such as Ho Chi Minh City, Jakarta, Bangkok, Dar Es Salaam, etc. students integrate knowledge and skills from other courses taught in the same semester, e.g. concepts of Behavioural Interventions, Transport Infrastructure, Intelligent Solutions in Transportation, etc. In parallel and together with fellow students you immediately apply what you learn to the case of an international mega-city. The case-study is developed in co-operation with an expert with expertise in the local transportation and traffic safety situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collective feedback moment ✔
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Small group session ✔
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case study ✔
|
|
|
|
Group work ✔
|
|
|
|
Paper ✔
|
|
|
|
Presentation ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 1 Credits 10,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Written evaluaton during teaching periode | 60 % |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral evaluation during teaching period | 40 % |
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | A student must have a tolerable score (min 8/20) on each component in order to pass the course. |
|
|
|
| Consequences | A student who has a non-tolerable score for one or more components (<8/20), will get 'fail' as the end result. |
|
|
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Presentations and additional course material (relevant articles, datasets, etc.) will be provided via Blackboard. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 examination regulations art.1.3, section 4. |
| 2 examination regulations art.4.7, section 2. |
3 examination regulations art.2.2, section 3.
|
| Legend |
| SBU : course load | SP : ECTS | N : Dutch | E : English |
|