| Language of instruction : English |
| Exam contract: not possible |
|
Sequentiality
|
| |
|
No sequentiality
|
| Degree programme | | Study hours | Credits | P1 SBU | P1 SP | 2nd Chance Exam1 | Tolerance2 | Final grade3 | |
 | first year Master of Biomedical Sciences - Clinical Biomedical Sciences | Compulsory | 81 | 3,0 | 81 | 3,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical |  |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| 4. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences has knowledge of state-of-the-art techniques within biomedical research and is able to apply these techniques, taking into account the applicable quality standards. | - EC
| 7. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences takes a critical attitude towards one's own research and that of others. | - EC
| 9. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can set up, conduct and report biomedical research in an ethical manner and with integrity, taking into account current regulations. | - EC
| KBW 2. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences specialization Clinical Biomedical Sciences has knowledge and understanding of the regulations of "Good Clinical Practice" and can apply this in practice; he / she can also design and follow up clinical studies. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
The student:
- knows that different quality systems exist and knows when to apply these systems.
- knows the accreditation process and the stakeholders involved.
- knows that the type of analysis determines the setup of the laboratoria.
- knows what document management (including validation) is about and can apply it.
- knows the principles of a quality system and can apply these: SOP, QC, audit, CAPA,
- knows the basic principles of medical devices
- knows what parameters are important in method and result validation (e.g. correctness, precision, selectivity and specificity, linear and dynamic range, correlation and goodness-of-fit, robustness, limit of detection, internal standards, calibration curves, primary, secondary and third line control) and can apply the procedures (calculation sheets) to determine or to calculate these parameters.
- knows the principle of the reduciblity or convertability of results (in SI units) to the primary standard and the concept of a 'fit for purpose' validation.
- knows how to design a validation plan, apply it and implement a new SOP for both qualitative and quantitative methods.
- knows how to construct, use, and interpret a Levey-Jennings chart.
- knows the principles of multirule interpretation (Westgard rules).
- knows the purpose of audits, proficiency testing, critical evaluation, corrective actions and controle effect or CA: Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excursion/Fieldwork ✔
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Project ✔
|
|
|
|
Self-study assignment ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 1 Credits 3,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Written evaluaton during teaching periode | 0 % |
|
|
|
| Oral evaluation during teaching period | 0 % |
|
|
|
| Written exam | 50 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral exam | 50 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other | Presentation group work. The group work also includes buddy check evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | - The evaluation consists of multiple parts. For all parts of the evaluation, at least a score of 8/20 must be obtained in order to pass for the course.
- Each student has to contribute sufficiently to the group assignment. |
|
|
|
| Consequences | A student who achieves a score lower than 8/20 on one (or more) parts of the evaluation will receive a 'fail' as final result. This final result is not tolerable.
A student who scores at least 8/20 for all parts of the evaluation receives as score a weighted average of the different grades. This final mark is tolerable. Eg. 8/20 + 16/20 = 12/20 (passed)
A student who possibly has participated significantly less in the group assignment than the other group members, will follow the free-riding behavior process as explained on Blackboard. During this process, the student will receive a temporary score "X" (no exam grade available). If free-riding behavior is identified, the student will receive "F" (fail) as final score for the course, and will receive an alternative assignment during the second-chance exam period. The results of the other evaluation parts can be retained for the second-chance exam if the student has passed or had received a tolerable mark. |
|
|
|
| Additional information | When working in team, sufficient input from each student is expected. Peer evaluation is done by the Buddycheck program on Blackboard. For each student, the score of the group work will be multiplied by the factor that is calculated by this program. The method of calculation and the way this process works, is further explained on Blackboard. If there is a potentially significant smaller contribution, the process regarding free-riding behavior will be started. |
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Educational material will be made available on blackboard
Lectures
Educational sites with legislation and description of accreditation systems |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2nd year Master of Biomedical Sciences - Bioelectronics and Nanotechnology | Compulsory | 81 | 3,0 | 81 | 3,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
| 2nd year Master of Biomedical Sciences - Environmental Health Sciences | Compulsory | 81 | 3,0 | 81 | 3,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
| 2nd year Master of Biomedical Sciences - Molecular Mechanisms in Health and Disease | Compulsory | 81 | 3,0 | 81 | 3,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| 4. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences has knowledge of state-of-the-art techniques within biomedical research and is able to apply these techniques, taking into account the applicable quality standards. | - EC
| 7. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences takes a critical attitude towards one's own research and that of others. | - EC
| 9. A graduate of the Master of Biomedical Sciences can set up, conduct and report biomedical research in an ethical manner and with integrity, taking into account current regulations. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
The student:
- knows that different quality systems exist and knows when to apply these systems.
- knows the accreditation process and the stakeholders involved.
- knows that the type of analysis determines the setup of the laboratoria.
- knows what document management (including validation) is about and can apply it.
- knows the principles of a quality system and can apply these: SOP, QC, audit, CAPA,
- knows the basic principles of medical devices
- knows what parameters are important in method and result validation (e.g. correctness, precision, selectivity and specificity, linear and dynamic range, correlation and goodness-of-fit, robustness, limit of detection, internal standards, calibration curves, primary, secondary and third line control) and can apply the procedures (calculation sheets) to determine or to calculate these parameters.
- knows the principle of the reduciblity or convertability of results (in SI units) to the primary standard and the concept of a 'fit for purpose' validation.
- knows how to design a validation plan, apply it and implement a new SOP for both qualitative and quantitative methods.
- knows how to construct, use, and interpret a Levey-Jennings chart.
- knows the principles of multirule interpretation (Westgard rules).
- knows the purpose of audits, proficiency testing, critical evaluation, corrective actions and controle effect or CA: Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excursion/Fieldwork ✔
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Project ✔
|
|
|
|
Self-study assignment ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 1 Credits 3,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Written evaluaton during teaching periode | 0 % |
|
|
|
| Oral evaluation during teaching period | 0 % |
|
|
|
| Written exam | 50 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral exam | 50 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other | Presentation group work. The group work also includes buddy check evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | - The evaluation consists of multiple parts. For all parts of the evaluation, at least a score of 8/20 must be obtained in order to pass for the course.
- Each student has to contribute sufficiently to the group assignment. |
|
|
|
| Consequences | A student who achieves a score lower than 8/20 on one (or more) parts of the evaluation will receive a 'fail' as final result. This final result is not tolerable.
A student who scores at least 8/20 for all parts of the evaluation receives as score a weighted average of the different grades. This final mark is tolerable. Eg. 8/20 + 16/20 = 12/20 (passed)
A student who possibly has participated significantly less in the group assignment than the other group members, will follow the free-riding behavior process as explained on Blackboard. During this process, the student will receive a temporary score "X" (no exam grade available). If free-riding behavior is identified, the student will receive "F" (fail) as final score for the course, and will receive an alternative assignment during the second-chance exam period. The results of the other evaluation parts can be retained for the second-chance exam if the student has passed or had received a tolerable mark. |
|
|
|
| Additional information | When working in team, sufficient input from each student is expected. Peer evaluation is done by the Buddycheck program on Blackboard. For each student, the score of the group work will be multiplied by the factor that is calculated by this program. The method of calculation and the way this process works, is further explained on Blackboard. If there is a potentially significant smaller contribution, the process regarding free-riding behavior will be started. |
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Educational material will be made available on blackboard
Lectures
Educational sites with legislation and description of accreditation systems |
|
|
|
|
|
| Master of Teaching in Health Sciences keuzetraject BMW/GEN met vakdidactiek biologie | Optional | 81 | 3,0 | 81 | 3,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
| Master of Teaching in Health Sciences keuzetraject BMW/GEN met vakdidactiek chemie | Optional | 81 | 3,0 | 81 | 3,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| The newly graduated student has insight into the organisation of health care, the policy and ethical aspects of health care and the interaction between the various stakeholders. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
The student:
- knows that different quality systems exist and knows when to apply these systems.
- knows the accreditation process and the stakeholders involved.
- knows that the type of analysis determines the setup of the laboratoria.
- knows what document management (including validation) is about and can apply it.
- knows the principles of a quality system and can apply these: SOP, QC, audit, CAPA,
- knows the basic principles of medical devices
- knows what parameters are important in method and result validation (e.g. correctness, precision, selectivity and specificity, linear and dynamic range, correlation and goodness-of-fit, robustness, limit of detection, internal standards, calibration curves, primary, secondary and third line control) and can apply the procedures (calculation sheets) to determine or to calculate these parameters.
- knows the principle of the reduciblity or convertability of results (in SI units) to the primary standard and the concept of a 'fit for purpose' validation.
- knows how to design a validation plan, apply it and implement a new SOP for both qualitative and quantitative methods.
- knows how to construct, use, and interpret a Levey-Jennings chart.
- knows the principles of multirule interpretation (Westgard rules).
- knows the purpose of audits, proficiency testing, critical evaluation, corrective actions and controle effect or CA: Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excursion/Fieldwork ✔
|
|
|
|
Lecture ✔
|
|
|
|
Project ✔
|
|
|
|
Self-study assignment ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 1 Credits 3,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Written evaluaton during teaching periode | 0 % |
|
|
|
| Oral evaluation during teaching period | 0 % |
|
|
|
| Written exam | 50 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oral exam | 50 % |
|
| Transfer of partial marks within the academic year | ✔ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Other | Presentation group work. The group work also includes buddy check evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation conditions (participation and/or pass) | ✔ |
|
| Conditions | - The evaluation consists of multiple parts. For all parts of the evaluation, at least a score of 8/20 must be obtained in order to pass for the course.
- Each student has to contribute sufficiently to the group assignment. |
|
|
|
| Consequences | A student who achieves a score lower than 8/20 on one (or more) parts of the evaluation will receive a 'fail' as final result. This final result is not tolerable.
A student who scores at least 8/20 for all parts of the evaluation receives as score a weighted average of the different grades. This final mark is tolerable. Eg. 8/20 + 16/20 = 12/20 (passed)
A student who possibly has participated significantly less in the group assignment than the other group members, will follow the free-riding behavior process as explained on Blackboard. During this process, the student will receive a temporary score "X" (no exam grade available). If free-riding behavior is identified, the student will receive "F" (fail) as final score for the course, and will receive an alternative assignment during the second-chance exam period. The results of the other evaluation parts can be retained for the second-chance exam if the student has passed or had received a tolerable mark. |
|
|
|
| Additional information | When working in team, sufficient input from each student is expected. Peer evaluation is done by the Buddycheck program on Blackboard. For each student, the score of the group work will be multiplied by the factor that is calculated by this program. The method of calculation and the way this process works, is further explained on Blackboard. If there is a potentially significant smaller contribution, the process regarding free-riding behavior will be started. |
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
|
|
| Compulsory course material |
| |
Educational material will be made available on blackboard
Lectures
Educational sites with legislation and description of accreditation systems |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.12.2, section 2. |
| 2 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.16.9, section 2. |
3 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.15.1, section 3.
|
| Legend |
| SBU : course load | SP : ECTS | N : Dutch | E : English |
|