| Language of instruction : English |
| Exam contract: not possible |
|
Sequentiality
|
| |
|
No sequentiality
|
| Degree programme | | Study hours | Credits | P2 SBU | P2 SP | 2nd Chance Exam1 | Tolerance2 | Final grade3 | |
 | 3rd year Bachelor of Engineering Technology - Electronics and ICT Engineering Technology | After selection | 108 | 4,0 | 108 | 4,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical |  |
| 3rd year Bachelor of Engineering Technology - Software Systems Engineering Technology | After selection | 108 | 4,0 | 108 | 4,0 | Yes | Yes | Numerical | |
|
| | | Learning outcomes |
- EC
| EC3 - The holder of the degree is able to recognize problems independently and can take initiative to plan activities and perform accordingly. | | | - DC
| 3.1 The student can formulate a relevant research question. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 3.2 The student can plan a technical-scientific project in a structured manner. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 3.3 The student can take action (on his own initiative) | | | | - BC
| The student takes initiative in the selection of an appropriate international activity. | - EC
| EC4 - The holder of the degree can gather and obtain relevant scientific and/or technical information and/or he/she can measure the necessary information efficiently and conscientiously. Additionally, he/she can make correct references to information. | | | - DC
| 4.1 The student can look up scientific and/or technical information in a goal-oriented manner. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 4.2 The student can collect test results in a structured manner. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | - EC
| EC5 - The holder of the degree can analyse unknown, domain-specific problems, subdivide them, structure them logically, determine the preconditions and interpret the data scientifically. | | | - DC
| 5.1 The student can interpret test results, results from simulations, statistical data and/or technical information in a structured manner. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 5.3 The student can (re)formulate a given problem statement symbolically/parametrically correct. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 5.4 The student can divide problems into sub-problems. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | - EC
| EC6 - The holder of the degree can select and use adequate solution methods to solve unknown, domain-specific problems and can work methodologically and make solid design choices. | | | - DC
| 6.1 The student can select an appropriate solution method. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 6.2 The student can implement the chosen solution method correctly. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 6.4 The student can solve a given problem symbolically/parametrically correctly. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | - EC
| EC7 - The holder of the degree can use the selected methods and tools innovatively to systematically implement domain-specific solutions and designs while being aware of practical and economic conditions and company-related implications. | | | - DC
| 7.1 The student can build up and/or carry out an experiment. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 7.2 The student can use technical aids such as calculators, measuring devices and software. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | - EC
| EC8 - The holder of the degree can interpret (incomplete) results, can deal with uncertainties and constraints and can evaluate knowledge and skills critically to adjust own reasoning and course of action accordingly. | | | - DC
| 8.2 The student can reflect critically on a technical-scientific project. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 8.3 The student can adjust his own thinking and actions through critical reflection. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 8.4 The student can deal with uncertain and/or restrictive contexts. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | - EC
| EC9 - The holder of the degree can communicate with colleagues in oral and in written form (including in a graphical way) about domain-specific aspects in suited language making use of apt terminology. | | | - DC
| 9.1 The student is able to communicate in writing in a correct, structured and appropriate manner in languages relevant to their field of study.
| | | | - BC
| The student writes a paper on the topic of the international activity. The depth and scope of the paper are in accordance with the forseen study load. | - EC
| EC10 - The holder of the degree can function as member of a (multidisciplinary) team using a constructive and responsible approach. | | | - DC
| 10.1 The student has an eye for and contributes to determining the best working method to tackle a shared assignment. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | | | - DC
| 10.2 The student can collaborate actively and constructively with others to achieve a common goal (product). | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | - EC
| EC11 - The holder of the degree is able to think and act responsibly realising a project taking into account social and international values, relations and consequences. | | | - DC
| 11.2 The student has insight and takes into account the interests of different stakeholders. | | | | - BC
| The student adapts to the (international) context of the exchange or assignment. | | | | - BC
| The student puts possible differences in method and approach at the host institution in relation to the usual working methods at home university. | | | - DC
| 11.3 The student has insight into and takes into account the social relevance and consequences in the realization of an assignment. | | | | - BC
| The student takes the 'international' dimension of the assignment into account. | | | | - BC
| The student adapts, if necessary his work and study method to the changed context of the assignment. | | | - DC
| 11.4 The student has an eye for and takes into account generally accepted social and ethical standards in his own thinking and actions. | | | | - BC
| The student shows interest and respect for other cultures, is open to different views and opinions and takes this into account in its communication. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. | - EC
| EC12 - The holder of the degree can act application-oriented and goal-driven and can act academically and professionally with the necessary perseverance and with eye for realism and efficiency, showing a research-oriented attitude towards lifelong learning. | | | - DC
| 12.1 The student has an open attitude to learn from experience, feedback and mistakes. | | | | - BC
| The student embraces the assignment/exchange in order to create a maximum learning experience for themselves. | | | - DC
| 12.2 The student shows an investigative attitude. | | | | - BC
| The student broadens, independently, his basic knowledge for the assignment/exchange. | | | - DC
| 12.3 The student adopts an appropriate engineering attitude (accurate, efficient, safe, result-oriented,...). | | | | - BC
| The student works efficiently with a clear focus on the successful completion of the assignment/exchange. | | | | - BC
| The evaluation criteria are determined by the host institution, in cooperation with the home institution, and depending on the nature of the international activity. The home university will monitor the overall intended competencies. |
|
| | EC = learning outcomes DC = partial outcomes BC = evaluation criteria |
|
|
In this course, state-of-the-art knowledge from different scientific and engineering area's are offered in an
international context. This can be conducted by different means such as summerschools, international scientific or
engineering competitions.
The aim of this course is to maximise the student's talent development. Therefore the student may make his own proposal. The OMT will assess this and approve or reject it.
4 SP corresponds to 108 study load hours and an exchange (or external stay) of 1 to 3 weeks. A short exchange is accompanied by an extensive paper. In the case of a long exchange, a short paper is sufficient.
The 'assignment' may be carried out individually or in a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The organisational method depends on the project. ✔
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The teaching method depends on the project. ✔
|
|
|
|
Period 2 Credits 4,00
| Evaluation method | |
|
| Other evaluation method during teaching period | 100 % |
|
| Other | The students will be assessed upon their ability to gather state-of-the-art information from different scientific and engineering areas and combine this knowledge to a final product (or process) which is presented and evaluated by a written or oral work. The evaluation method depends on the available input from the international project or competitions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Second examination period
| Evaluation second examination opportunity different from first examination opprt | |
|
|
|
| Remarks |
| |
Situering in het leerdomein/curriculum: Het opleidingsonderdeel ‘International Window of Mobility’ behoort in eerste instantie tot het leerlijndomein “Ingenieur en maatschappij” gecombineerd met ingenieursvaardigheden en technologische verdieping. IWoM focust op het aanscherpen van de ‘Employbility Skill’ (ES) ‘Internationaal gericht en maatschappelijk verantwoord handelen’ en draagt bij tot competenties ‘Initiëren en plannen’, ‘Communiceren’ en ‘Samenwerken’.
Relatie met werkveld: De internationale dimensie is niet langer weg te denken in het bedrijfsleven en bij uitbreiding onze samenleving. IWoM moet de internationale blik van de student verruimen bij voorkeur via een kort buitenlands verblijf. Dit kan bijvoorbeeld in de vorm van een summerschool of via een uitwisselingsovereenkomst met een partneruniversiteit. Een opdracht binnen een internationaal bedrijf met onderzoeksafdeling kan eveneens onderwerp zijn van IWoM.
Relatie met onderzoek: Een internationale ervaring an sich volstaat natuurlijk niet. Er moet steeds via de inhoud van de opdracht een link zijn met de ingenieursopleiding. Dit mag verdiepend of verbredend zijn. Mogelijk kan de inhoud ook oriënterend zijn voor de keuzeopleidingsonderdelen in de master en/of is de inhoud gelinkt aan de onderzoeksexpertise van de gastinstelling. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.12.2, section 2. |
| 2 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.16.9, section 2. |
3 Education, Examination and Legal Position Regulations art.15.1, section 3.
|
| Legend |
| SBU : course load | SP : ECTS | N : Dutch | E : English |
|